Thursday, October 30, 2014
Search By Keyword
Breaking News Alerts
Email Alerts
Email Address
Text Alerts
Mobile Number
 )  - 
Mobile Provider
standard messaging rates apply
Website       
Ward 1 Councilman Matt Taylor, left, said he believes the International Building Codes promote Agenda 21. He was one of four Mustang City Council members that voted against adopting the 2009 International Building Codes.
 

By Jon Watje
Managing Editor
 

 

The Mustang City Council voted down the adoption of an international set of building codes after several citizens expressed their concerns about the origin of the codes, saying they promoted an international agenda that could jeopardize their rights.

The City Council voted 4-3 against the adoption of the codes. Mark Grubbs, Terry Jones and Jay Adams voted in favor of the codes while Matt Taylor, Linda Bowers, Linda Hagan and Don Mount voted against them.

The City Council considered adopting the 2009 International Building Codes, authored by the International Council Committee (ICC) at their previous meeting in March.

Ward 1 City Councilman Matt Taylor voiced his concerns with the origin of the codes and questioned whether they were best for the City of Mustang. He urged that the city held a public hearing on the codes for local citizens to voice their opinions on them.

Mustang developer Robert Crout spoke to the city council at their April 2 meeting and encouraged them to adopt the codes.

"I am a board member of the Oklahoma State Homebuilders Association and our executive officer was interested in this item and asked me to come tonight to let the council know that the association appreciates you thinking of us when you are looking to adopt plans like this," Crout said. "These particular codes have been long discussed by the state homebuilders association and it has been brought through the state of Oklahoma. We endorsed them and we think Mustang should accept them."

Several citizens spoke out against the codes.

Mustang resident Juanita Holland said she believed the codes were linked to Agenda 21, which is a nonbinding, voluntarily implemented action plan created by the United Nations regarding sustainable development.

"Councilman Taylor, thanks for letting us have a public hearing on this," Holland said. "I did a lot of research over the past several days about Agenda 21. You are right, this is mandated by the government, but it is the government taking over our rights and taking our private property. I would hate to see Mustang become one of the cities that lets the United Nations come in and walk all over it. This city council is our local government and we elect you to be our voices, we don’t have the voice you do."

Yukon resident Danielle Patterson also spoke out against the codes and voiced her displeasure that House Bill 1412 is in danger of not being heard. The bill would prohibit the state from contracting with or exchanging funds with a nongovernmental or intergovernmental organization accredited by the U.N. The House voted 67-17, mostly along party lines, to pass the bill.

"You all are our voice here and our line of defense," Patterson said. "I would ask that you would stand for our sovereignty, our state and our nation. I wonder, what does an international entity have to do with local plumbers, electricians and construction workers. Are we not our own? We should remain sovereign."

Jason Timm of Mustang also spoke out against the codes. Timm is the Fourth District committee man for the Republican Party. He also served as a alternate delegate at the Republican National Convention in Florida last summer.

"The fact of the matter is, the national issues don’t get resolved at the national level, they get resolved at the city level," Timm said. "We are built from the ground up, not from the top down. If you never read this Agenda 21 stuff or studied it, it probably sounds crazy. We are talking about the laundering of ideologies and philosophies. This is a United Nations agenda that they are trying to launder down to us. I didn’t believe it at first, and I have talked to people all over the state and they are completely clueless about Agenda 21. I don’t think they are bad people or evil people, I just think they are lost in this whole maze of organizations."

Timm urged the city council to find another set of codes.

"I truly think Mustang needs to find a separate set of codes and reject these ICC codes," he said. "I agree that we need to have sound building codes, but I beg that you hold this off as long as possible before everyone has had a chance to research some of this stuff. It all sounds like science fiction, but it’s not and you need to reject this so we don’t promote Agenda 21."

Mustang Community Development Director Robert Coleman told the city council that the City had adopted the 2003 International Building Code but had never adopted the 2006 codes.

He proposed for the city to adopt nine books of building codes at their March meeting. He said the city is required to keep three sets of the codes in inventory and the total cost for all three sets is $2,253.

"I didn’t study Agenda 21, but I do know that there are some codes that the state did not adopt," Coleman said. "No code is perfect, but these codes are the only ones that address modern building materials and other things."

Taylor said he believed Mustang should create its own codes rather than adopt the international codes.

"Our staff here knows what is best for Mustang," Taylor said. "Even before these international codes, we were doing just fine with other codes."

Adams said he supported the codes.

"You said Mr. Coleman knows what is best for Mustang," Adams said to Taylor. "And he is recommending that we adopt these codes."

Ward 6 Councilman Don Mount said he was not comfortable adopting the codes.

"I’m interested in the citizens’ basic rights and I don’t want to give those up," Mount said. "I don’t know what the differences are between the 2003 codes and the 2009 codes, but I’m not going to approve the changes when I don’t know what they are."

Taylor said he would continue to fight against Agenda 21.

"This is real, this is not a conspiracy theory or something generated by right-win activists," he said "This is a threat to our local property rights. I will take this fight to the state to restore local control."


Visitor Comments
 
Submitted By: Kenneth Paige Submitted: 8/18/2013
Do not let them pass those codes if you love you love your town! The citizens of Blackwell,Okla have been going through Hell since our city council members pass these codes here without giving citizens a chance to vote them down or vote for them. They passed them and now have torn our friendly city apart. If you don't believe it check out Blackwell on enter-net.


Submitted By: ivsenroute Submitted: 5/17/2013
Are people there that dumb? I cannot fathom the fact that these people are thinking in this manner. They obviously have no clue what they are talking about. I would expect this from a 3rd world country with no internet but in America? Really? Are there schools there?


Submitted By: Jason Timm Submitted: 4/14/2013
Once two thirds of Agenda 21 was adopted, under President HW Bush, an international organization was later formed, known as, the "International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives" (ICLEI). The ICLEI was assembled for the purpose to help implement the goals of Agenda 21 in local communities. While the ideas and philosophies behind Agenda 21 are less than appealing to the free citizen new terms and labels were developed so policies would not read “Agenda 21”. Instead of labeling it Agenda 21, they use much more harmless sounding labels such as "smart growth", "comprehensive land use planning" and especially "sustainable development". When President Clinton came to office he formed by executive order the "President's Council for Sustainable Development" to implement the UN21 policies including the ones HW Bush could not garner support for. The same year President Clinton established the President’s Council for Sustainable Development, the International Code Council (ICC) was also created. The ICC has teamed up with ICLEI on numerous occasions and has developed a large number of "international codes" which are intended to replace existing building codes all over the United States. Many of the codes are as follows, International Building Code International Residential Code International Fire Code International Plumbing Code International Mechanical Code International Fuel Gas Code International Energy Conservation Code ICC Performance Code International Wildland Urban Interface Code International Existing Building Code International Property Maintenance Code International Private Sewage Disposal Code International Zoning Code International Green Construction Code For the most part, they contain a lot of things that are contained in existing building codes or that are common sense but a lot of poison has been inserted into these codes. If you read them carefully and know the UN Agenda 21, the influence of Agenda 21 is blatantly obvious. Unfortunately, most of the local politicians that are adopting these codes don't take the time to read them. They will often just assume that they are "updating" their existing building codes. It would be great if these codes were just about public safety. But that is simply not the case. Sadly, these codes are often used to fine or even imprison homeowners that haven't done anything wrong. Sometimes "code violations" are even used as justification to legally steal property from law-abiding homeowners. Within the last 20 years, a two-pronged approach has been established by Agenda 21 advocates - the top-down approach of national mandates and grants coupled with the bottom-up approach of snaring local governments in ICLEI-style “sustainability.” This has had a tremendous impact on building and zoning codes throughout the United States. The International Codes of the International Code Council (ICC), as stated before, is an organization founded in 1994 and self proclaims it is “Dedicated to helping the building safety community and construction industry provide safe, sustainable and affordable construction through the development of codes and standards used in the design, build and compliance process.” (ICC website.) Agenda 21 7.60 promotes a “culture of safety,” and the ICC has dutifully stepped up to fill that void with its Agenda-21-based “International” codes. Just in 2012, the ICC teamed up with ICLEI, in a Webinar Series promoting its Building Energy Code, with bottom-up, Local-Agenda-21-promoting. One of the topics for discussion? “An introduction to building codes as a policy tool conducted by ICLEI and targeted to primary staff liaisons and code officials.” Agenda 21 contains a list of items considered to be "unsustainable". Of these items they include but are not limited to private property, commercial agriculture, rural towns and dwellings, private transportation as in cars, water rights, and traditional family units. If some one is looking for a direct link they will not find one. What they will find is a chain of organizations laundering "sustainable development" ideologies to the local governments of which the ICC is included.


Submitted By: FireBuddy Submitted: 4/11/2013
Please tell me this is an April Fools joke.


Submitted By: David Karmol Submitted: 4/10/2013
Mr. Taylor is mistaken. The International Building Code and the International Residential Code do not originate with the UN. They are developed entirely by local United State building officials, at meetings in the United States. They are adopted in all 50 states, and are not endorsed or supported ion any way by the United Nations. Agenda 21 may be a bad idea, but it has nothing to do with the International Code Council, and the ICC family of building codes.





Advertisers
click ad below for details
  • Show All Ads